On 23 March 2017 at 21:27, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 20 March 2017 at 05:40, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> There was still a static ram value set in the rk3188-board from the
>> time where we didn't have actual sdram init code.
>> Now the sdram init leaves the ram information in SYS_REG2 and we can
>> d
On 20 March 2017 at 05:40, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> There was still a static ram value set in the rk3188-board from the
> time where we didn't have actual sdram init code.
> Now the sdram init leaves the ram information in SYS_REG2 and we can
> decode it similarly to the rk3288.
>
> Right now we ha
There was still a static ram value set in the rk3188-board from the
time where we didn't have actual sdram init code.
Now the sdram init leaves the ram information in SYS_REG2 and we can
decode it similarly to the rk3288.
Right now we have two duplicates of that code, which is still ok and
doesn't
3 matches
Mail list logo
