On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:51:08AM +0100, Arnab Basu wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> On 08/28/2014 03:40 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Arnab,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:29:55PM +0100, Arnab Basu wrote:
> >> Both ARMv7 and ARMv8 need to patch the device tree but the kind
> >> of patching done is diff
Hi Mark
On 08/28/2014 03:40 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Arnab,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:29:55PM +0100, Arnab Basu wrote:
Both ARMv7 and ARMv8 need to patch the device tree but the kind
of patching done is different. This creates a function that can be
defined by each architecture to handle th
Hi Arnab,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:29:55PM +0100, Arnab Basu wrote:
> Both ARMv7 and ARMv8 need to patch the device tree but the kind
> of patching done is different. This creates a function that can be
> defined by each architecture to handle the differences
I have no problem with the patch, b
Both ARMv7 and ARMv8 need to patch the device tree but the kind
of patching done is different. This creates a function that can be
defined by each architecture to handle the differences
Signed-off-by: Arnab Basu
Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma
Cc: Marc Zyngier
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c |
4 matches
Mail list logo