Dear Minkyu,
Yes, the patchset you referred needs to be ignored as it is V1 patchset.
You need to refer to V7 patchset present at the URL
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg107511.html
Thanks & Regards
Amarendra
On 27 March 2013 13:10, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Amar,
>
> On 2
Dear Amar,
On 27/03/13 14:38, Amarendra Reddy wrote:
> Dear Minkyu,
>
> Please refer to the latest version of emmc patchset, which is V7 patchset.
>
> The function definition 'exynos_dwmci_init()' has been changed when compared
> to V1 patchset.
It means.. should I ignore this patchset?
>
>
Dear Minkyu,
Please refer to the latest version of emmc patchset, which is V7 patchset.
The function definition 'exynos_dwmci_init()' has been changed when
compared to V1 patchset.
Here is the URL for latest version.
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg107511.html
Thanks & Regar
Dear Amar,
On 05/12/12 22:31, Amar wrote:
> This patch defines the call back required by dw mmc driver to get the
> clock value. It also adds function to set the dw mmc clock divider ratio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amarendra Reddy
> ---
> drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c | 14 +-
> 1 files c
On 12/05/2012 10:31 PM, Amar wrote:
> This patch defines the call back required by dw mmc driver to get the
> clock value. It also adds function to set the dw mmc clock divider ratio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amarendra Reddy
> ---
> drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c | 14 +-
> 1 files changed,
This patch defines the call back required by dw mmc driver to get the
clock value. It also adds function to set the dw mmc clock divider ratio.
Signed-off-by: Amarendra Reddy
---
drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dr
6 matches
Mail list logo
