Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fs: cbfs: fix locating the cbfs header

2018-04-01 Thread Simon Glass
On 1 April 2018 at 22:19, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 22 February 2018 at 08:08, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 15.02.18 07:40, Andre Heider wrote: >>> The value at the end of the rom is not a pointer, it is an offset >>> relative to the end of rom. >> >> Do you have any documentation poin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fs: cbfs: fix locating the cbfs header

2018-04-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 22 February 2018 at 08:08, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 15.02.18 07:40, Andre Heider wrote: >> The value at the end of the rom is not a pointer, it is an offset >> relative to the end of rom. > > Do you have any documentation pointers to this? Even just pointing to a > specific line of c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fs: cbfs: fix locating the cbfs header

2018-02-21 Thread Alexander Graf
On 15.02.18 07:40, Andre Heider wrote: > The value at the end of the rom is not a pointer, it is an offset > relative to the end of rom. Do you have any documentation pointers to this? Even just pointing to a specific line of code in coreboot would be helpful in case anyone wants to read it up.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fs: cbfs: fix locating the cbfs header

2018-02-14 Thread Andre Heider
The value at the end of the rom is not a pointer, it is an offset relative to the end of rom. Signed-off-by: Andre Heider --- fs/cbfs/cbfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cbfs/cbfs.c b/fs/cbfs/cbfs.c index 6e1107d751..46da8f134f 100644 --- a/fs/cbfs/c