On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>> This udelay() was added as an HACK and is no longer required. All
>> read/write/erase operations work fine even without this delay. Hence,
>> remove the udelay() call.
>>
>> Tested rea
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
> This udelay() was added as an HACK and is no longer required. All
> read/write/erase operations work fine even without this delay. Hence,
> remove the udelay() call.
>
> Tested read/write/erase operation on AM437x SK. Also tested QSPI B
This udelay() was added as an HACK and is no longer required. All
read/write/erase operations work fine even without this delay. Hence,
remove the udelay() call.
Tested read/write/erase operation on AM437x SK. Also tested QSPI Boot.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh R
---
drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c | 7 ---
3 matches
Mail list logo