Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fsl: add register read-back to set_law()

On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > After programming a new LAW, we should read-back the LAWAR register > so that > we sync the writes. Otherwise, code that attempts to use the new > LAW-mapped > memory might fail. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > --- > drivers/misc/fsl_law.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fsl: add register read-back to set_law()

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > After programming a new LAW, we should read-back the LAWAR register so that > we sync the writes.  Otherwise, code that attempts to use the new LAW-mapped > memory might fail. This should say, "code that attempts to use the new LAW-mapped memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fsl: add register read-back to set_law()

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > After programming a new LAW, we should read-back the LAWAR register so that > we sync the writes.  Otherwise, code that attempts to use the new LAW-mapped > memory might fail. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Just FYI, there is no [PATCH 1/2]. Kum

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fsl: add register read-back to set_law()

After programming a new LAW, we should read-back the LAWAR register so that we sync the writes. Otherwise, code that attempts to use the new LAW-mapped memory might fail. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- drivers/misc/fsl_law.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --gi