Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-05 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2011/2/1 Reinhard Meyer : > Dear all, >>> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >>>  -pie -r -o libat91.o  lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o >>> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear all, >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >> -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: >> -r an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2011/2/1 Michael Trimarchi : > Hi > > On 02/01/2011 01:16 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : >> >>> Hi >>> >>> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >>>  -pie -r -o libat91.o  lowlevel_ini

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-01 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi On 02/01/2011 01:16 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : > >> Hi >> >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >> -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o >> /home/to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : > Hi > > /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld > -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o > /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnue

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-02-01 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Dear Remy On 01/27/2011 11:46 PM, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Since U-boot v2010.12 the at91sam9261ek board is broken. > This is solved and tested on this board. > > Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap) > to load U-boot at a different address compared to previous re

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-01-28 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, >> -COBJS-y += at91sam9261ek.o >> +COBJS-y += $(BOARD).o >>   COBJS-y += led.o >>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH) += partition.o >> >> -SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c) >> -OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(COBJS-y)) >> -SOBJS        := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS)) >> +SRCS := $(SOBJS-y:.o=.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-01-27 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Remy, Le 27/01/2011 23:46, Remy Bohmer a écrit : > Since U-boot v2010.12 the at91sam9261ek board is broken. > This is solved and tested on this board. > > Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap) > to load U-boot at a different address compared to previous rel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-01-27 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi All, 2011/1/27 Remy Bohmer : > Since U-boot v2010.12 the at91sam9261ek board is broken. > This is solved and tested on this board. > > Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap) > to load U-boot at a different address compared to previous releases of > U-boot du

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

2011-01-27 Thread Remy Bohmer
Since U-boot v2010.12 the at91sam9261ek board is broken. This is solved and tested on this board. Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap) to load U-boot at a different address compared to previous releases of U-boot due to conflicts in the BSS area during reloca