Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-28 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:09:19 +0200 Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Anatolij, Hi Stefano, > > I'm not really ok with it as is. Currently we have video support for > > two boards in the tree using the mx3fb driver. Applying this patch > > as is will break the display support for qong and imx31_phycore.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-21 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/21/2011 10:02 AM, Helmut Raiger wrote: > On 09/20/2011 03:09 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> I tried, I cannot. We have not the LCD anymore for the QONG board ;-(( >> I have patched the QONG for fixing the build, but I cannot test it. >> >> Best regards, >> Stefano > > I don't really know how to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-21 Thread Helmut Raiger
On 09/20/2011 03:09 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > I tried, I cannot. We have not the LCD anymore for the QONG board ;-(( > I have patched the QONG for fixing the build, but I cannot test it. > > Best regards, > Stefano I don't really know how to address this, but what if we simply insert a compile t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/20/2011 02:36 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Hi Stefano, Helmut, > Hi Anatolij, > I'm not really ok with it as is. Currently we have video support for > two boards in the tree using the mx3fb driver. Applying this patch > as is will break the display support for qong and imx31_phycore. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-20 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Stefano, Helmut, On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:44:33 +0200 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 09/05/2011 01:47 PM, Helmut Raiger wrote: > > mx3fb.c was based on CONFIG_LCD and is moved by this patch to > > CONFIG_VIDEO, which has greater freedom in selecting videomodes > > even at runtime. > > > > Hi Anato

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/05/2011 01:47 PM, Helmut Raiger wrote: > mx3fb.c was based on CONFIG_LCD and is moved by this patch to > CONFIG_VIDEO, which has greater freedom in selecting videomodes > even at runtime. > Hi Anatolji, do you have some comments about this patch ? Is it ok for you if I put it in my IMX que

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Moving mx3fb.c to CONFIG_VIDEO

2011-09-05 Thread Helmut Raiger
mx3fb.c was based on CONFIG_LCD and is moved by this patch to CONFIG_VIDEO, which has greater freedom in selecting videomodes even at runtime. This renders the accumulating list of display defines (CONFIG_DISPLAY_VBEST..., CONFIG_DISPLAY_C057...) obsolete as these may be setup through env variable