Hi Bin,
On 2 December 2015 at 22:11, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> On 2 December 2015 at 01:58, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> There is no need to pass shared_data to fsp_continue() so we can
>>> remove unnecessary codes that simplifies
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 2 December 2015 at 01:58, Bin Meng wrote:
>> There is no need to pass shared_data to fsp_continue() so we can
>> remove unnecessary codes that simplifies the function a lot.
>
> Is this because shared_data is effective
Hi Bin,
On 2 December 2015 at 01:58, Bin Meng wrote:
> There is no need to pass shared_data to fsp_continue() so we can
> remove unnecessary codes that simplifies the function a lot.
Is this because shared_data is effectively useful for a bootloader due
to the stack being changed?
>
> Signed-of
There is no need to pass shared_data to fsp_continue() so we can
remove unnecessary codes that simplifies the function a lot.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_support.h | 4 +---
arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_support.c | 29 ++---
2 files changed,
4 matches
Mail list logo
