Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Sorry for not responding to this series very fast, because I wanted to
> look into it carefully.
> Below my comments on this patch
>
> 2009/9/28 Tom Rix :
>> The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
>> similarly named structure definitions for
Hi Tom,
Sorry for not responding to this series very fast, because I wanted to
look into it carefully.
Below my comments on this patch
2009/9/28 Tom Rix :
> The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
> similarly named structure definitions for
>
> usb_device_descriptor
> usb_str
The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
similarly named structure definitions for
usb_device_descriptor
usb_string_descriptor
usb_endpoint_descriptor
usb_config_descriptor vs usb_configuration_descriptor
usb_interface_descriptor
There should only be one definition of these st
From: Tom Rix
The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
similarly named structure definitions for
usb_device_descriptor
usb_string_descriptor
usb_endpoint_descriptor
usb_config_descriptor vs usb_configuration_descriptor
usb_interface_descriptor
There should only be one defini
The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
similarly named structure definitions for
usb_device_descriptor
usb_string_descriptor
usb_endpoint_descriptor
usb_config_descriptor vs usb_configuration_descriptor
usb_interface_descriptor
There should only be one definition of these st
5 matches
Mail list logo