Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> Hi Marek,
>
> Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
> tools.
>
> General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler to patch
> the existing Linux tools in-place so that we can use them on the U-Boot
> tree?
>
> Detailed comments
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 02:28:19 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
> > tools.
> >
> > General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler to patch
> > the existing Linux
Dear Graeme Russ,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> >
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
> >> tools.
> >>
> >> General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
>> tools.
>>
>> General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler to patch
>> the existing Linux tools in-pla
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> Hi Marek,
>
> Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
> tools.
>
> General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler to patch
> the existing Linux tools in-place so that we can use them on the U-Boot
> tree?
Yes, it is a good idea
Hi Marek,
Comments based on the assumption that we want to sync with the Linux
tools.
General comment/hypothetical question: would it not be simpler to patch
the existing Linux tools in-place so that we can use them on the U-Boot
tree?
Detailed comments below in this spirit; ignore if suggestion
6 matches
Mail list logo