Hi Andreas,
On 8/22/2013 14:26, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Please adopt all places in this file with mentioned changes and tell me
>>your opinion about erroneous return value.
>
>For the erroneous return value, actually we never check it (consider it
>always successfully). So, I think now we just
Hi Bo,
On 22.08.13 05:15, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 8/21/2013 23:08, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
>> Hi Bo,
>>
>> On 08/13/2013 08:38 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
>> Please adopt all places in this file with mentioned changes and tell me
>> your opinion about erroneous return value.
>
> For the er
Hi Andreas,
On 8/21/2013 23:08, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Hi Bo,
On 08/13/2013 08:38 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
fix code to use pointer for pio port as the warning message suggested
remove the warning message
Signed-off-by: Bo Shen
---
drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 232 ++--
Hi Bo,
On 08/13/2013 08:38 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
> fix code to use pointer for pio port as the warning message suggested
> remove the warning message
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen
> ---
> drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 232
> ++
> 1 file changed, 134 insertio
fix code to use pointer for pio port as the warning message suggested
remove the warning message
Signed-off-by: Bo Shen
---
drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 232 ++
1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c b/
5 matches
Mail list logo