Hi Stephen,
On 18 July 2016 at 10:23, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/17/2016 03:23 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Some SoCs have a single clock device. Provide a way to find it given its
>> driver name. This is handled by the linker so will fail if the name is not
>> found, avoiding strange errors w
On 07/17/2016 03:23 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Some SoCs have a single clock device. Provide a way to find it given its
driver name. This is handled by the linker so will fail if the name is not
found, avoiding strange errors when names change and do not match. It is
also faster than a string compari
On 17 July 2016 at 15:23, Simon Glass wrote:
> Some SoCs have a single clock device. Provide a way to find it given its
> driver name. This is handled by the linker so will fail if the name is not
> found, avoiding strange errors when names change and do not match. It is
> also faster than a strin
Some SoCs have a single clock device. Provide a way to find it given its
driver name. This is handled by the linker so will fail if the name is not
found, avoiding strange errors when names change and do not match. It is
also faster than a string comparison.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
drive
4 matches
Mail list logo