On 11/08/2016 10:04 PM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>>
> If we keep A009942 workaround in fsl_ddr_gen4.c,
> 1) we have to duplicate 3 same implement of A009942 separately in
> mpc85xx_ddr_gen3.c, arm_ddr_gen3.c and fsl_ddr_gen4.c, that is not a good
> idea.
> 2) we have to modify more code struct to in
> -Original Message-
> From: york sun
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 1:04 AM
> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942 and clean related
> erratum
>
> On 11/08/2016 02:39 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Mess
On 11/08/2016 09:03 AM, york@nxp.com wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 02:39 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: york sun
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 1:04 AM
>>> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942
On 11/08/2016 02:39 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: york sun
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 1:04 AM
>> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942 and clean related
>> erratum
>>>
>>> York,
>>>
>>> This
> -Original Message-
> From: york sun
> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 1:04 AM
> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942 and clean related
> erratum
> >
> > York,
> >
> > This change(moving to ctrl_regs.c) has the same effect as
On 11/06/2016 06:42 PM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: york sun
>> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 11:20 PM
>> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942 and clean related
>> erratum
>>
>> On 11/04/2016 04:18 A
> -Original Message-
> From: york sun
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 11:20 PM
> To: Shengzhou Liu ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsl/ddr: Revise erratum a009942 and clean related
> erratum
>
> On 11/04/2016 04:18 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> > - add additional function
On 11/04/2016 04:18 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> - add additional function erratum_a009942_check_cpo to check if the
> board needs tuning CPO calibration for optimal setting.
> - move ERRATUM_A009942(with revision to check cpo_sample option) from
> fsl_ddr_gen4.c to ctrl_regs.c for reuse on all D
- add additional function erratum_a009942_check_cpo to check if the
board needs tuning CPO calibration for optimal setting.
- move ERRATUM_A009942(with revision to check cpo_sample option) from
fsl_ddr_gen4.c to ctrl_regs.c for reuse on all DDR4/DDR3 parts.
- move ERRATUM_A008378 from fsl_ddr_g
9 matches
Mail list logo
