Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] NET: LAN91C96 CONFIG_NET_MULTIify

2009-11-23 Thread Menon, Nishanth
Wolfgang Denk said the following on 11/22/2009 05:01 PM: > Dear Nishanth Menon, > > In message <1255669597-10607-2-git-send-email...@ti.com> you wrote: > >> Make the lan91c96 driver capable of CONFIG_NET_MULTI >> to be clean for the new arch, add a a lil detect function >> > --^

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] NET: LAN91C96 CONFIG_NET_MULTIify

2009-11-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nishanth Menon, In message <1255669597-10607-2-git-send-email...@ti.com> you wrote: > Make the lan91c96 driver capable of CONFIG_NET_MULTI > to be clean for the new arch, add a a lil detect function ----^^^ "for the new arch" is not really helpful for the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] NET: LAN91C96 CONFIG_NET_MULTIify

2009-11-09 Thread Ben Warren
Nishanth, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Make the lan91c96 driver capable of CONFIG_NET_MULTI > to be clean for the new arch, add a a lil detect function > Most of the formatting change was done to keep checkpatch > silent, but a few functions and #if 0ed code which > does not make sense for NET_MULTI ha

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] NET: LAN91C96 CONFIG_NET_MULTIify

2009-10-15 Thread Nishanth Menon
Make the lan91c96 driver capable of CONFIG_NET_MULTI to be clean for the new arch, add a a lil detect function Most of the formatting change was done to keep checkpatch silent, but a few functions and #if 0ed code which does not make sense for NET_MULTI have been removed Now, use the lan91c96_init