Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910182055.01744.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
...
> From 1ffa4c71d249e877c8b4b84e412af7efc1e8f113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Frysinger
> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:37:11 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] env_embedded: remove unused code from linker scrip
On Monday 26 October 2009 08:34:35 Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2009 13:26:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Thanks. With this patch, most of the ppc4xx compile problems I have
> > > noticed are gone now. But unfortunately not all. Those two 4xx
> > > platforms still don't compile:
> > >
On Monday 26 October 2009 15:17:45 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > should be harmless, but obviously it's ugly. the attached patch should
> > fix things up. the related issue is the one i raised in the other env
> > embedded thread wrt the meaning of "ENV_IS_EMBEDDED" ...
>
> I
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910260436.12814.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> should be harmless, but obviously it's ugly. the attached patch should fix
> things up. the related issue is the one i raised in the other env embedded
> thread wrt the meaning of "ENV_IS_EMBEDDED" ...
I see
On Monday 26 October 2009 13:26:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Thanks. With this patch, most of the ppc4xx compile problems I have
> > noticed are gone now. But unfortunately not all. Those two 4xx platforms
> > still don't compile:
> >
> > CRAYL1 EXBITGEN
> >
> > $ ./MAKEALL CRAYL1
> > Configuring f
On Monday 26 October 2009 08:13:57 Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2009 09:36:11 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > But when I remove the CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED definition from line 127
> > > of include/configs/kilauea.h, then I get this:
> > >
> > > ./MAKEALL kilauea kilauea_nand
> > > Con
On Monday 26 October 2009 09:36:11 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > But when I remove the CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED definition from line 127
> > of include/configs/kilauea.h, then I get this:
> >
> > ./MAKEALL kilauea kilauea_nand
> > Configuring for kilauea board...
> >textdata bss
On Sunday 25 October 2009 17:55:07 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i'm attaching two patches here. since we're past the merge window but
> > before rc1, i dont know how invasive you want to get.
> >
> > the first one restores env_embedded.o building for certain config options
> >
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910182055.01744.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> i'm attaching two patches here. since we're past the merge window but before
> rc1, i dont know how invasive you want to get.
>
> the first one restores env_embedded.o building for certain config options
> (e
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910182055.01744.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > This patch seems to break a *lot* of boards:
>
> i'm attaching two patches here. since we're past the merge window but before
> rc1, i dont know how invasive you want to get.
>
> the first one restores env_emb
On Monday 19 October 2009 05:31:36 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > diff --git a/board/tqc/tqm8xx/u-boot.lds b/board/tqc/tqm8xx/u-boot.lds
> > index 2df8d84..8207b2c 100644
> > --- a/board/tqc/tqm8xx/u-boot.lds
> > +++ b/board/tqc/tqm8xx/u-boot.lds
> > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > * MA 0
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910182055.01744.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > This patch seems to break a *lot* of boards:
>
> i'm attaching two patches here. since we're past the merge window but before
> rc1, i dont know how invasive you want to get.
>
> the first one restores env_
On Sunday 18 October 2009 17:32:15 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so
> > > > attempting to compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless.
> > > > Now that the env headers have unified
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910181751.13743.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> i'd prefer to fix. my guess is these boards link in the .o all the time even
> when they dont have an embedded environment (which isnt a big deal -- the
> file
> would be 0 bytes in that case).
>
> where can
On Sunday 18 October 2009 17:32:15 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so
> > > > attempting to compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless.
> > > > Now that the env headers have unified
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910181701.33654.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so attempting to
> > > compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless. Now that the env
> > > headers have unified ar
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200910181701.33654.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > [My understanding is that patch 2/2 will go through your BF repo now,
> > right?]
>
> i can do that since it's already in my vendor branch
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering
On Sunday 18 October 2009 16:53:54 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so attempting to
> > compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless. Now that the env
> > headers have unified around CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED, convert
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1254338999-16311-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so attempting to
> compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless. Now that the env
> headers have unified around CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDD
The env code is protected by the ENV_IS_EMBEDDED define, so attempting to
compile the code when this isn't defined is pointless. Now that the env
headers have unified around CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED, convert the build
system to only build the env objects when this is enabled. And now that
the env c
20 matches
Mail list logo
