Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I tend to prefer my version, as it seems to be more defensive, and it
> also adds an assert() for the 3rd parameter.
>
> If you agree, I'll apply my version?
Yes, of course.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=
Dear Stefano Babic,
In message <4bd81816.2050...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> I have already sent a patch fixing this issue,
I've seen it (unfortunately only after running into this myself).
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-April/070347.html
>
> However, I preferred (easier way) to fix t
Hi Stefano,
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 13:12:22 Stefano Babic wrote:
> > The "mtdparts add" command wrote through a NULL pointer - on many
> > systems this went unnoticed (PowerPC has writable RAM there, some ARM
> > systems have ROM where a write has no effect), but on arm1136
> > (i.MX31) it cra
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> The "mtdparts add" command wrote through a NULL pointer - on many
> systems this went unnoticed (PowerPC has writable RAM there, some ARM
> systems have ROM where a write has no effect), but on arm1136
> (i.MX31) it crashed the system.
>
> Add appropriate checks.
>
Hi Wolf
The "mtdparts add" command wrote through a NULL pointer - on many
systems this went unnoticed (PowerPC has writable RAM there, some ARM
systems have ROM where a write has no effect), but on arm1136
(i.MX31) it crashed the system.
Add appropriate checks.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
---
common/c
5 matches
Mail list logo