Dear Tom,
In message <20190331113756.GG18421@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > You could say the same for any online help. I do not understand why you
> > consider these commands not worth a description while we provide online
> > help for all other commands including "test", "echo", "help" and even
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:21:01PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/29/19 1:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Heinrich,
> >
> > In message <20190329113408.2168-1-xypron.g...@gmx.de> you wrote:
> >> Provide online help for hush commands 'if', 'for', and 'while'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: H
On 3/29/19 1:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heinrich,
>
> In message <20190329113408.2168-1-xypron.g...@gmx.de> you wrote:
>> Provide online help for hush commands 'if', 'for', and 'while'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
>
> Why for these, and not for the rest of the shell syntax?
I
Dear Heinrich,
In message <20190329113408.2168-1-xypron.g...@gmx.de> you wrote:
> Provide online help for hush commands 'if', 'for', and 'while'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Why for these, and not for the rest of the shell syntax?
This does not make sense to me. Shell syntax is way
Provide online help for hush commands 'if', 'for', and 'while'.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
common/cli_hush.c | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/cli_hush.c b/common/cli_hush.c
index 955e8fe536..d7dfa8a75a 100644
--- a/common/cli_hush.c
+++
5 matches
Mail list logo