Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] distro bootcmd: define bootloader name for x86

2017-11-29 Thread Bin Meng
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: >> Currently X86 does not properly support distro defaults. >> This patch is only a partial fix. >> >> It provides the name of the bootloader EFI application >> for the X86 architectu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] distro bootcmd: define bootloader name for x86

2017-11-29 Thread Bin Meng
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Currently X86 does not properly support distro defaults. > This patch is only a partial fix. > > It provides the name of the bootloader EFI application > for the X86 architecture. > > The architecture dependent file names are defined in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] distro bootcmd: define bootloader name for x86

2017-11-26 Thread Simon Glass
On 24 November 2017 at 14:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Currently X86 does not properly support distro defaults. > This patch is only a partial fix. > > It provides the name of the bootloader EFI application > for the X86 architecture. > > The architecture dependent file names are defined in th

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] distro bootcmd: define bootloader name for x86

2017-11-24 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Currently X86 does not properly support distro defaults. This patch is only a partial fix. It provides the name of the bootloader EFI application for the X86 architecture. The architecture dependent file names are defined in the UEFI specification. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- includ