Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

2014-05-07 Thread Tim Harvey
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote: > > On 06/05/14 07:35, Tim Harvey wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Eric Nelson >> wrote: > > > >>> The function name ..._array() also doesn't really capture what's >>> going on here. Naming is hard though, and I'm not coming up

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

2014-05-07 Thread Nikita Kiryanov
On 06/05/14 07:35, Tim Harvey wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: The function name ..._array() also doesn't really capture what's going on here. Naming is hard though, and I'm not coming up with something else. Perhaps 'sparse', 'skip', or alternate? ya, I'm not sur

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

2014-05-05 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Tim, > Hi Eric, > > On 04/28/2014 01:17 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> >> >> Add new function that can take an array of iomux configs, an index, and >> a stride to allow a multi-dimentional array of pinmux values to be used >> to define pinmux v

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

2014-04-29 Thread Eric Nelson
Hi Tim, On 04/28/2014 01:17 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > Add new function that can take an array of iomux configs, an index, and a stride to allow a multi-dimentional array of pinmux values to be used to define pinmux values per cpu-type. This takes a different approach to previously proposed soluti

[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

2014-04-28 Thread Tim Harvey
Add new function that can take an array of iomux configs, an index, and a stride to allow a multi-dimentional array of pinmux values to be used to define pinmux values per cpu-type. This takes a different approach to previously proposed solutions which used multiple arrays of pad lists. The goal i