On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:23:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 28 January 2016 at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:39:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> The existing function to add a new property to a tree being built requires
> >> that the entire conte
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:39:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> The existing function to add a new property to a tree being built requires
> that the entire contents of the new property be passed in. For some
> applications it is more convenient to be able to add the property contents
> later, perha
Hi David,
On 28 January 2016 at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:39:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> The existing function to add a new property to a tree being built requires
>> that the entire contents of the new property be passed in. For some
>> applications it is more
The existing function to add a new property to a tree being built requires
that the entire contents of the new property be passed in. For some
applications it is more convenient to be able to add the property contents
later, perhaps by reading from a file. This avoids double-buffering of the
conten
4 matches
Mail list logo