Le 12/07/2017 à 21:56, Tom Rini a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:53:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Christophe,
In message <194b25e4-81fc-52cf-aeef-61ce6f467...@c-s.fr> you wrote:
Oh ? Ok. I thought it would be a possible name because for instance in
the Linux Kernel, the watchdog
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:53:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Christophe,
>
> In message <194b25e4-81fc-52cf-aeef-61ce6f467...@c-s.fr> you wrote:
> >
> > Oh ? Ok. I thought it would be a possible name because for instance in
> > the Linux Kernel, the watchdog driver is named that way and
Dear Christophe,
In message <194b25e4-81fc-52cf-aeef-61ce6f467...@c-s.fr> you wrote:
>
> Oh ? Ok. I thought it would be a possible name because for instance in
> the Linux Kernel, the watchdog driver is named that way and used also
> for the 8xx and so was also the SPI driver before its name wa
Dear Wolfgang,
Le 12/07/2017 à 15:07, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Christophe Leroy,
In message
you wrote:
reginfo command is calling mpc8xx_reginfo(), mpc85xx_reginfo()
or mpc86xx_reginfo() based on CONFIG_ symbol.
As those 3 functions can't me defined at the same time, let's
rename them m
Dear Christophe Leroy,
In message
you wrote:
> reginfo command is calling mpc8xx_reginfo(), mpc85xx_reginfo()
> or mpc86xx_reginfo() based on CONFIG_ symbol.
> As those 3 functions can't me defined at the same time, let's
> rename them mpc8xxx_reginfo() to avoid the #ifdefs
This is indeed a te
reginfo command is calling mpc8xx_reginfo(), mpc85xx_reginfo()
or mpc86xx_reginfo() based on CONFIG_ symbol.
As those 3 functions can't me defined at the same time, let's
rename them mpc8xxx_reginfo() to avoid the #ifdefs
Lets all remove the #ifdefs around the U_BOOT_CMD as this
file is only compi
6 matches
Mail list logo
