On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:19:28PM +0300, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/14 17:02, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:45:57PM +0300, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 04:11:57 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> On 04/08/14 16:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 03:45:57 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >> On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> H
On 04/08/14 17:02, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:45:57PM +0300, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:
On 04/08/14 16:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 03:45:57 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:3
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 04:02:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
> Eeep. That seems very likely to be gotten incorrect by users.
>
> Can we do something like:
> mxc_spi.c:
> __weak int board_map_spi_cs_value(int desired_cs) { return -EINVAL; }
>
> fooboard.c:
> board_map_spi_cs_value(int desired
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:45:57PM +0300, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >>Hi Marek,
> >>
> >>On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kir
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 03:45:57 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kir
On 04/08/14 16:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
MXC SPI driver has a feature whereas a GPIO line can be used as a CS
sign
On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 02:48:54 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >> MXC SPI driver has a feature whereas a GPIO line can be used as a CS
> >> signal. This is set up by joi
Hi Marek,
On 03/08/14 16:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
MXC SPI driver has a feature whereas a GPIO line can be used as a CS
signal. This is set up by joining the CS and GPIO values into a single
value using (cs | gpio << 8), and passing
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:33 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> MXC SPI driver has a feature whereas a GPIO line can be used as a CS
> signal. This is set up by joining the CS and GPIO values into a single
> value using (cs | gpio << 8), and passing it off as a CS value. This
> breaks the sf pr
MXC SPI driver has a feature whereas a GPIO line can be used as a CS signal.
This is set up by joining the CS and GPIO values into a single value using
(cs | gpio << 8), and passing it off as a CS value. This breaks the sf probe
command, because it is no longer possible to invoke it as sf probe .
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
