Hello Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:14:05 +0100
> Heiko Schocher wrote:
[...]
>> But I was wondering why the DTTs are initialized so early. Is this
>> necessary? If not, I don;t need this ...
>
> I searched and didn't find out why. If there's no reason then maybe we
> don't
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:14:05 +0100
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>> between boots? If not, what's the reason the value isn't specified as
> >>> a CONFIG_SYS_DTT_BUS_NUM?
> >> It changes not between boots, but between different hardware.
> >
> > so why not make it a CONFIG_SYS_DTT_BUS_NUM instead of
Hello Kim
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:03:23 +0100
> Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> Hello Kim,
>
> Hello Heiko,
>
>> Kim Phillips wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:25:49 +0100
>>> Heiko Schocher wrote:
/* switch to correct I2C bus */
old_bus = I2C_GET_BUS();
-
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:03:23 +0100
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Kim,
Hello Heiko,
> Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:25:49 +0100
> > Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>/* switch to correct I2C bus */
> >>old_bus = I2C_GET_BUS();
> >> - I2C_SET_BUS(CONFIG_SYS_DTT_BUS_NUM);
> >> +
Hello Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:25:49 +0100
> Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> index 8119821..ecfc345 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>> #define DTT_TEMP_HYST
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:25:49 +0100
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index 8119821..ecfc345 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
> #define DTT_TEMP_HYST0x2
> #define DTT_TEMP_SET
This patch adds I2C support for the Keymile kmeter1 board.
It uses the First I2C Controller from the CPU, for
accessing 4 temperature sensors, an eeprom with IVM data
and the booteeprom over a pca9547 mux.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
board/keymile/common/common.c |2 +-
board/keymile
7 matches
Mail list logo
