Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 011/080] clk: clk-uclass: Fix style violations

2017-10-09 Thread Mario Six
Hi Simon, On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 29 September 2017 at 06:51, Mario Six wrote: >> checkpatch.pl complains that the clk_ops structures used in clk-uclass.c >> ought to be static, so we mark them as static. > > Do you mean static, or const? > I meant const; I'll fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 011/080] clk: clk-uclass: Fix style violations

2017-10-08 Thread Simon Glass
On 29 September 2017 at 06:51, Mario Six wrote: > checkpatch.pl complains that the clk_ops structures used in clk-uclass.c > ought to be static, so we mark them as static. Do you mean static, or const? Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Simon Glass > > Signed-off-by: Mario Six > --- > drivers/clk/clk

[U-Boot] [PATCH 011/080] clk: clk-uclass: Fix style violations

2017-09-29 Thread Mario Six
checkpatch.pl complains that the clk_ops structures used in clk-uclass.c ought to be static, so we mark them as static. Signed-off-by: Mario Six --- drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c b/driv