On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:59:45PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:46:54 -0700
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> > > 'sparseable,' or sparse-c
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:46:54 -0700
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> > 'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ultimately to catch type, address space,
> > and endianness mismatches
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> 'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ultimately to catch type, address space,
> and endianness mismatches and generally improve code quality. E.g., in this
> initial do
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:21:20 -0700
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> > > 'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ul
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> > 'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ultimately to catch type, address space,
> > and endianness misma
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 05:30:22PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:11:12 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:19:23PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> > > Hi David, Jon,
> > >
> > > Kim Phillips created a series of patches to change variable declaration
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:11:12 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:19:23PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> > Hi David, Jon,
> >
> > Kim Phillips created a series of patches to change variable declarations
> > that are big endian to be __be32/__be64. Since the device tree is
> >
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:19:23PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Hi David, Jon,
>
> Kim Phillips created a series of patches to change variable declarations
> that are big endian to be __be32/__be64. Since the device tree is
> defined to be big endian, he created a patch to mark the appropriate
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
> 'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ultimately to catch type, address space,
> and endianness mismatches and generally improve code quality. E.g., in this
> initial do
Hi David, Jon,
Kim Phillips created a series of patches to change variable declarations
that are big endian to be __be32/__be64. Since the device tree is
defined to be big endian, he created a patch to mark the appropriate
libfdt entities as __be*.
On 10/16/2012 08:28 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> T
This 32-patch series only begins to address making u-boot source more
'sparseable,' or sparse-clean, ultimately to catch type, address space,
and endianness mismatches and generally improve code quality. E.g., in this
initial dose whose main purpose is to reduce the output volume to workable
levels
11 matches
Mail list logo
