Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On 23 August 2018 at 05:23, Jens Wiklander wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> On 13 August 2018 at 09:53, Jens Wiklander >>> wrote: Hi, This adds s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

Hi Jens, On 23 August 2018 at 05:23, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Jens, >> >> On 13 August 2018 at 09:53, Jens Wiklander wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This adds support for storing AVB rollback indexes in the RPMB partition. >>> The R

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

Hi Jens, > Also, how is this stuff tested in U-Boot? I don't see any tests. I might be wrong, but I guess Simon means U-boot pytests in this context. When initial AVB2.0 patches were introduced, I've also added some avb tests for testing functionality rollback indexes/device unlock state (there w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

Hi Simon, On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On 13 August 2018 at 09:53, Jens Wiklander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This adds support for storing AVB rollback indexes in the RPMB partition. >> The RPMB partition (content and key) is managed by OP-TEE >> (https://www.op-t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

Hi Jens, On 13 August 2018 at 09:53, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Hi, > > This adds support for storing AVB rollback indexes in the RPMB partition. > The RPMB partition (content and key) is managed by OP-TEE > (https://www.op-tee.org/) which is a secure OS leveraging ARM TrustZone. > > The Linux kerne

[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVB using OP-TEE

Hi, This adds support for storing AVB rollback indexes in the RPMB partition. The RPMB partition (content and key) is managed by OP-TEE (https://www.op-tee.org/) which is a secure OS leveraging ARM TrustZone. The Linux kernel can already support OP-TEE with reading and updating rollback indexes i