Le 13/01/2012 21:07, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Sorry, but this patch series has become a mess; we have the original
1-9 series, then a v2 1-10, then v3 1-8, and even a v4 1-8, with htese
later series all being sparse ones. Sonce the number of patches
changed several times, it's totally unclear to
Dear David Wagner,
In message <1322080098-3151-1-git-send-email-david.wag...@free-electrons.com>
you wrote:
>
> First, thanks for having mainlined mkenvimage :)
>
> These patches mainly address Wolfgang's remarks. There are a couple others.
>
> I first intended to submit a v11 patch but since
On 21/12/2011 02:04, David Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I re-sent 2 patches that didn't apply anymore on top of next (v2 2/10
> and v2 3/10) ; the others should be fine.
>
> I also sent one more patch ([PATCH 09/10] Correctly handle input files
> beginning with several newlines)
>
> Could you please
Le 27/11/2011 20:59, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
don't see anything wrong with the latest patchset now, thanks!
-mike
Hi,
I re-sent 2 patches that didn't apply anymore on top of next (v2 2/10
and v2 3/10) ; the others should be fine.
I also sent one more patch ([PATCH 09/10] Correctly handle i
don't see anything wrong with the latest patchset now, thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi,
First, thanks for having mainlined mkenvimage :)
These patches mainly address Wolfgang's remarks. There are a couple others.
I first intended to submit a v11 patch but since the v10 was merged into
u-boot's master branch, I splitted the changes into 9 patches against it.
Regards,
6 matches
Mail list logo
