Hi Wolfgang and others,
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:11 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tor Krill,
>
> In message <1277366121-14683-1-git-send-email-...@excito.com> you wrote:
> > Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
> > consecutive from a base address.
>
> You posted t
Dear Tor Krill,
In message <1277370025-17281-1-git-send-email-...@excito.com> you wrote:
> Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
> consecutive from a base address.
>
> Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous
> addressing of its phys and thu
Dear Tor Krill,
In message <1277366121-14683-1-git-send-email-...@excito.com> you wrote:
> Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
> consecutive from a base address.
>
> Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous
> addressing of its phys and thu
Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
consecutive from a base address.
Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous
addressing of its phys and thus doesn't work with the current
implementation.
This patchset updates the implementation to use an
Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
consecutive from a base address.
Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous
addressing of its phys and thus doesn't work with the current
implementation.
This patchset updates the implementation to use an
Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are
consecutive from a base address.
Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous
addressing of its phys and thus doesn't work with the current
implementation.
This patchset updates the implementation to use an
6 matches
Mail list logo
