Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-11-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve over in TI > AM335x land and that is given that we support a number of different > boards with a single binary (and we have an i2c eeprom that tells us > what board and revisio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-29 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi Stephen, On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:15:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/26/2012 01:45 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> > Hi Tom, >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:15:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/26/2012 01:45 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-29 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/26/2012 01:45 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-26 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi Tom, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >>> Hey all,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-25 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solv

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/24/2012 01:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: ... >>> Doing something to derive this also means that custom >>> development can be a bit easier too since you can just set >>> fdtfile directly and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> Hey all, > >>> > >>> I've been thinking about one of the problems we need

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve >>> over in TI AM335x land and that is given that we support a >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve over in TI > > AM335x land and that is given that we support a number of different > > boards with a single b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve over in TI > AM335x land and that is given that we support a number of different > boards with a single binary (and we have an i2c eeprom that tells us > what board and revision we

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables

2012-10-24 Thread Tom Rini
Hey all, I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve over in TI AM335x land and that is given that we support a number of different boards with a single binary (and we have an i2c eeprom that tells us what board and revision we are on), the user needs to be able to easily determi