Hi,
I sent patches v5 and v10 and I have no more review since a few weeks,
so I think it's ok now, no ?
About the comment/definitions, it has been fixed in last patches :).
Best regards,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:55:10PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Gabriel Huau,
>
> In message <2012052
Dear Gabriel Huau,
In message <20120521203733.GC9379@debian> you wrote:
> Is it ok ? Can we apply theses patches ?
What do you mean - unfixed?
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:27:23PM +0200, Gabriel Huau wrote:
> > From the last time, I removed the patch about the PLL initialization because
> > it's
Is it ok ? Can we apply theses patches ?
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:27:23PM +0200, Gabriel Huau wrote:
> From the last time, I removed the patch about the PLL initialization because
> it's board specific. I added a new patch for s3c440 gpio driver. Now in the
> board file we have no more magic blo
Hi Minkyu Kang,
Can you review/apply theses patches please ? (Marex have already
tortured me ...) :
- [PATCH 1/2 v4] ARM : Add GPIO Driver and IOMUX definition for S3C2440
- [PATCH 2/2 v9] ARM : Add support for MINI2440 (s3c2440).
Thanks,
__
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:35:01PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Gabriel Huau,
>
> In message <20120430110724.GB4656@debian> you wrote:
> >
> > Just a little question about the ChangeLog. I added the "---" and my
> > changements after it, but I see this part in "git log", is it normal ?
> >
Dear Gabriel Huau,
In message <20120430110724.GB4656@debian> you wrote:
>
> Just a little question about the ChangeLog. I added the "---" and my
> changements after it, but I see this part in "git log", is it normal ?
> Will this part be deleted in the merge ?
You should never see this in a git
Hi,
Just a little question about the ChangeLog. I added the "---" and my
changements after it, but I see this part in "git log", is it normal ?
Will this part be deleted in the merge ?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mai
Dear Gabriel Huau,
In message <20120429213859.GA20804@debian> you wrote:
>
> > Should this not only affect the SPL part of the code, while you could
> > use normal mappings for the real U-Boot.
> >
> > Umm... but I don't even see any reference to SPL files here. Is this
> > current code supposed
Dear Gabriel Huau,
> From the last time, I removed the patch about the PLL initialization
> because it's board specific. I added a new patch for s3c440 gpio driver.
> Now in the board file we have no more magic bloat.
Even without looking, I sense flaws ... I sense fluctuations in the patch-force
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:32:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Gabriel Huau,
>
> In message <1335734845-27396-1-git-send-email-cont...@huau-gabriel.fr> you
> wrote:
> >
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * When booting from NAND, it is impossible to access the lowest
> > >> addresses
> > >> + * due to t
Dear Gabriel Huau,
In message <1335734845-27396-1-git-send-email-cont...@huau-gabriel.fr> you
wrote:
>
> >> +/*
> >> + * When booting from NAND, it is impossible to access the lowest addresses
> >> + * due to the SteppingStone being in the way. Luckily the NOR doesn't
> >> really
> >> + * care a
>From the last time, I removed the patch about the PLL initialization because
it's board specific. I added a new patch for s3c440 gpio driver. Now in the
board file we have no more magic bloat.
>> +/*
>> + * When booting from NAND, it is impossible to access the lowest addresses
>> + * due to the
These patches add the support for the mini2440 (s3c2440 arm). Currently, I'm
supporting only boot from NOR. The first patch move the PLL initialization
to SoC specific directory. I also changed boards which depend on this SoC.
Gabriel Huau (2):
S3C2440 : PLL Initialization should be SoC specific
13 matches
Mail list logo
