On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Becky Bruce wrote:
>> We don't want PHYS_64BIT on unconditionally. It has the effect of
>> moving all the devices into high physical memory, which means you
>> need a different Linux/dts.
>
> Another reason we should really be packaging the dev
Becky Bruce wrote:
> We don't want PHYS_64BIT on unconditionally. It has the effect of
> moving all the devices into high physical memory, which means you need a
> different Linux/dts.
Another reason we should really be packaging the device trees with u-boot.
> I expect the normal case to be
On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Becky Bruce wrote:
>> This will enable CONFIG_PHYS_36BIT for MPC8641HPCN.
>> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> Makefile |8 +++-
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>>
Becky Bruce wrote:
> This will enable CONFIG_PHYS_36BIT for MPC8641HPCN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Makefile |8 +++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 983a3cd..09e671d 100644
> --- a/Makefile
>
This will enable CONFIG_PHYS_36BIT for MPC8641HPCN.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 983a3cd..09e671d 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2436,8 +2436,14 @@ TQ
5 matches
Mail list logo