On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:21:51PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Maxime Ripard
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:31:46AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wr
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:21:51PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:31:46AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> 在 2017-10-31 21:54,Maxime Ripard 写道:
>> >> > On
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:21:51PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:31:46AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> 在 2017-10-31 21:54,Maxime Ripard 写道:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:05:36PM +0800, icen...@aosc.io wrote:
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:31:46AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 在 2017-10-31 21:54,Maxime Ripard 写道:
>> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:05:36PM +0800, icen...@aosc.io wrote:
>> > > 在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
>> > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:31:46AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2017-10-31 21:54,Maxime Ripard 写道:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:05:36PM +0800, icen...@aosc.io wrote:
> > > 在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > > > Some H5 boards
在 2017-10-31 21:54,Maxime Ripard 写道:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:05:36PM +0800, icen...@aosc.io wrote:
在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano
> > Pi
> > NEO2), which may no
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:05:36PM +0800, icen...@aosc.io wrote:
> 在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano
> > > Pi
> > > NEO2), which may not work properly at 1008MHz if
于 2017年10月31日 GMT+08:00 下午4:53:57, Jagan Teki
写到:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng
wrote:
Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g.
Nano Pi
NEO2), which may not work properl
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
> 在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>>
>>> Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano Pi
>>> NEO2), which may not work properly at 1008MHz if the chip's quality is
>>> n
在 2017-10-31 15:57,Jagan Teki 写道:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano
Pi
NEO2), which may not work properly at 1008MHz if the chip's quality is
not so good.
Lower the default CPUx frequency of H5 to 816MHz.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano Pi
> NEO2), which may not work properly at 1008MHz if the chip's quality is
> not so good.
>
> Lower the default CPUx frequency of H5 to 816MHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Z
Some H5 boards are designed to start at 1.1V CPUx voltage (e.g. Nano Pi
NEO2), which may not work properly at 1008MHz if the chip's quality is
not so good.
Lower the default CPUx frequency of H5 to 816MHz.
Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 in
12 matches
Mail list logo