Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: don't use %#l with CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF

2017-01-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:30:23PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2016-12-28 17:12 GMT+09:00 Oded Gabbay : > > In the tiny-printf implementation, there is no support for %# and/or %l. > > This > > patch checks if CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is defined and if so, prints a > > different debug statement

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: don't use %#l with CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF

2017-01-16 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2016-12-28 17:12 GMT+09:00 Oded Gabbay : > In the tiny-printf implementation, there is no support for %# and/or %l. This > patch checks if CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is defined and if so, prints a > different debug statement which doesn't use %#l > > Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay > Cc: Simon Glass > ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: don't use %#l with CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF

2017-01-11 Thread Simon Glass
On 28 December 2016 at 01:12, Oded Gabbay wrote: > In the tiny-printf implementation, there is no support for %# and/or %l. This > patch checks if CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is defined and if so, prints a > different debug statement which doesn't use %#l > > Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay > Cc: Simon Gla

[U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: don't use %#l with CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF

2016-12-28 Thread Oded Gabbay
In the tiny-printf implementation, there is no support for %# and/or %l. This patch checks if CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is defined and if so, prints a different debug statement which doesn't use %#l Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay Cc: Simon Glass --- common/spl/spl.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insert