On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:56:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Global definition of priv seems no-sense to use it
> for non-dm case and pass the pointer to functions
> which are common to both dm and non-dm.
>
> So, fix this by removing omap3_spi_slave from non-dm
> and make visible to omap3_spi_p
On 15 March 2016 at 23:56, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Global definition of priv seems no-sense to use it
> for non-dm case and pass the pointer to functions
> which are common to both dm and non-dm.
>
> So, fix this by removing omap3_spi_slave from non-dm
> and make visible to omap3_spi_priv for both dm
Global definition of priv seems no-sense to use it
for non-dm case and pass the pointer to functions
which are common to both dm and non-dm.
So, fix this by removing omap3_spi_slave from non-dm
and make visible to omap3_spi_priv for both dm and non-dm.
Cc: Christophe Ricard
Reported-by: Tom Rini
3 matches
Mail list logo