Hi Axel,
Any testing on this patch?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Currently we have similar code for (txp && rxp), (txp && !rxp), (!rxp & txp),
> and (!txp && !rxp) cases. This patch refactors the code a bit to avoid
> duplicate similar code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> -
Currently we have similar code for (txp && rxp), (txp && !rxp), (!rxp & txp),
and (!txp && !rxp) cases. This patch refactors the code a bit to avoid
duplicate similar code.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
Hi Thomas,
This path is similar to the patch I sent for spi-oc-tiny.c linux driver.
I'd apprecia
2 matches
Mail list logo