On 10/20/2016 01:01 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 19 October 2016 08:58 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 05:19 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/19/2016 04:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vig
On Wednesday 19 October 2016 08:58 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 05:19 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2016 04:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi,
...
>> You can probabl
On 10/19/2016 05:19 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 04:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 10:23
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 04:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday
On 10/19/2016 04:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> If the write
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of w
On 10/19/2016 06:40 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
l
On 10/19/2016 06:40 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
l
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 05:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>> If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
>>> length, then issue word length writes till the we reac
On 10/18/2016 10:23 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
>> length, then issue word length writes till the we reach the dangling
>> bytes. On the final write, issue byte by byte wr
On Thursday 06 October 2016 04:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
> length, then issue word length writes till the we reach the dangling
> bytes. On the final write, issue byte by byte write to complete the
> transaction. This marginally
If the write transaction size(write_bytes) is not a multiple of word
length, then issue word length writes till the we reach the dangling
bytes. On the final write, issue byte by byte write to complete the
transaction. This marginally improves write throughput when performing
random sized writes to
12 matches
Mail list logo