Hi
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 6 August 2016 at 20:10, Michael Trimarchi
> wrote:
>
> I understand your point but I don't have enough part number and I can
> only to
> test on this one. I will verify this patch too and put my review and drop
> my
On 6 August 2016 at 20:10, Michael Trimarchi
wrote:
I understand your point but I don't have enough part number and I can only
to
test on this one. I will verify this patch too and put my review and drop
my
personal one. Anyway can you ask if the first 0x8000 are co
On 22 June 2016 at 15:44, Yao Yuan wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 06:08 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:00:49AM +, Yao Yuan wrote:
>> > On 06/22/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> > > The S25FS128 is part of S25FS-S family physical sectors may be
>> > > configured as
On 06/22/2016 06:08 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:00:49AM +, Yao Yuan wrote:
> > On 06/22/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> > > The S25FS128 is part of S25FS-S family physical sectors may be
> > > configured as a hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sec
Hi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:00:49AM +, Yao Yuan wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> > The S25FS128 is part of S25FS-S family physical sectors may be configured
> > as a
> > hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sectors at the top or bottom of
> > the
> > addres
On 06/22/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> The S25FS128 is part of S25FS-S family physical sectors may be configured as a
> hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sectors at the top or bottom of the
> address space with all but one of the remaining sectors being uniform size.
> This
>
The S25FS128 is part of S25FS-S family physical sectors may be
configured as a hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sectors
at the top or bottom of the address space with all but one of the
remaining sectors being uniform size. This rework a bit commit
80c1bfd2332e71dfe669cac53ba06b7435a7ca3
7 matches
Mail list logo