Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: fix up Model B entries

2016-01-28 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/25/2016 01:36 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > It seems like the P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior > to Revision 2.0, there's no need for a separate device tree. > > Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB > memory models; there also were 256Mi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: fix up Model B entries

2016-01-28 Thread popcorn mix
I believe this is accurate for identifying boards from revision numbers: https://github.com/AndrewFromMelbourne/raspberry_pi_revision >From the firmware, old style revision numbers: case 0x02: case 0x03: boardrev = MAKE_BOARDREV(MODELB, 1_1); break; case 0x04: case 0x05: case

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: fix up Model B entries

2016-01-26 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/25/2016 01:36 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > It seems like the P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior > to Revision 2.0, there's no need for a separate device tree. > > Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB > memory models; there also were 256Mi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: fix up Model B entries

2016-01-25 Thread Lubomir Rintel
It seems like the P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior to Revision 2.0, there's no need for a separate device tree. Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB memory models; there also were 256MiB 2.0 boards. I don't have all of the boards to check t