Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Support dual link OSD

2011-01-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Eibach, Dirk", In message <48d3d52125c49b43ae880038e2e5314bb5b...@srv101.gdsys.de> you wrote: > > So, if you insist, I will convert our code to C struct based access. Please do. > Maybe you could point me to a nice clean implementation in u-boot, so I > can use the semantics you prefer (

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Support dual link OSD

2011-01-18 Thread Eibach, Dirk
> Dear Dirk Eibach, Dear Wolfgang, > ... > > #define BASE_WIDTH 32 > > @@ -38,12 +44,18 @@ > > enum { > > REG_CONTROL = 0x0010, > > REG_MPC3W_CONTROL = 0x001a, > > + REG_EXT_INTERRUPT = 0x001c, > > + REG_EXT_INTERRUPT_ENABLE = 0x001e, > > + REG_IIC_WRITE_MAILBOX = 0x0030, > > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Support dual link OSD

2011-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dirk Eibach, In message <1294662805-11704-3-git-send-email-eib...@gdsys.de> you wrote: > > #define BASE_WIDTH 32 > @@ -38,12 +44,18 @@ > enum { > REG_CONTROL = 0x0010, > REG_MPC3W_CONTROL = 0x001a, > + REG_EXT_INTERRUPT = 0x001c, > + REG_EXT_INTERRUPT_ENABLE = 0x001e, >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Support dual link OSD

2011-01-12 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Dirk, On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:25 Dirk Eibach wrote: > Add support for dual link osd hardware for gdsys 405ep. This patch also changes many lines introduced by the 2 previous patches. Again I'm thinking if it makes more sense to squash all those 3 patches into one. Would be interestin

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Support dual link OSD

2011-01-10 Thread Dirk Eibach
Add support for dual link osd hardware for gdsys 405ep. Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach --- board/gdsys/405ep/dlvision-10g.c |3 +- board/gdsys/common/osd.c | 303 - board/gdsys/common/osd.h |2 +- 3 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 76 del