Vadim,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Vadim,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury
>> wrote:
>>> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
>>> instance when checkpatch r
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Vadim,
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
>> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
>> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
>> that the email would be sent.
Vadim,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury wrote:
> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
> that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
> shown on the screen,
For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
Add some code to repor
4 matches
Mail list logo
