Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: e1000: Support 64-bit physical address

Hi, On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:06 PM, York Sun wrote: >> From: Mingkai Hu >> >> High 32-bit address is needed when u-boot runs in 64-bit space. >> Tested on armv8-based LS2085ARDB. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu >> Signed-off-by: York

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: e1000: Support 64-bit physical address

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:06 PM, York Sun wrote: > From: Mingkai Hu > > High 32-bit address is needed when u-boot runs in 64-bit space. > Tested on armv8-based LS2085ARDB. > > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu > Signed-off-by: York Sun Applied to u-boot-net, thanks! -Joe __

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: e1000: Support 64-bit physical address

Hi York, On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:06 PM, York Sun wrote: > From: Mingkai Hu > > High 32-bit address is needed when u-boot runs in 64-bit space. > Tested on armv8-based LS2085ARDB. > > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu > Signed-off-by: York Sun Acked-by: Joe Hershberger _

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: e1000: Support 64-bit physical address

From: Mingkai Hu High 32-bit address is needed when u-boot runs in 64-bit space. Tested on armv8-based LS2085ARDB. Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: York Sun --- drivers/net/e1000.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000.c b/d