Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net/eth: Don't issue warnings for offboard ethernet chips

2011-12-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Moffett, Kyle D", In message <58a08f2d-4743-4634-a909-466eb8535...@boeing.com> you wrote: > > > Yes, it should. The rule is that then environment settings always > > have precedence, and if they are missing or contain different data > > than other sources for this information, a waning shal

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net/eth: Don't issue warnings for offboard ethernet chips

2011-12-19 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Dec 17, 2011, at 15:16, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kyle Moffett, > In message <1324001821-15337-1-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> When using an offboard ethernet chip such as e1000, it is highly likely >> that the driver has already read a valid MAC address from the o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net/eth: Don't issue warnings for offboard ethernet chips

2011-12-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1324001821-15337-1-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > When using an offboard ethernet chip such as e1000, it is highly likely > that the driver has already read a valid MAC address from the onboard > EEPROM. In that case, U-Boot should not issue

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net/eth: Don't issue warnings for offboard ethernet chips

2011-12-15 Thread Kyle Moffett
When using an offboard ethernet chip such as e1000, it is highly likely that the driver has already read a valid MAC address from the onboard EEPROM. In that case, U-Boot should not issue a warning about the absence of an "eth*addr" value in the environment. Since the calling code in drivers/usb/