--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic wrote:
...
>
> This is exactly what you want to add, only after setting
> the regulators.
> Why do we need to set the gpio twice ?
You are right. Please disregard my patch.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
___
U-Boo
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Fabio,
>> udelay(200);
>> mxc_gpio_set(46);
This must be,
>>
>> What do you think ?
>
> Yes, I agree. Do you plan to send a patch for mx51evk using this approach?
>
> If you do, then I can re-submit my patch after your update.
I sent today a pa
Hi Stefano,
--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Stefano Babic wrote:
...
>
> I know I am responsible for this usage, because I forget to
> add some
> accessors for the gpio pins - as I see your patch, I have
> sent a patch
> to support it. However, a direct access to registers using
> offsets is
> not allowed
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY (LAN8700) on the MX51EVK.
>
Hi Fabio,
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c |4
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
Provide a proper reset for the Ethernet PHY (LAN8700) on the MX51EVK.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
b/board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c
index 75d642
5 matches
Mail list logo