On Friday 30 October 2009 12:47:33 Scott Wood wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Should I drop the easylogo change, if it's currently being built outside
> the toplevel makefile system?
if you tested what you said (setting the var from the cmdline), then i'd leave
it. we can address poor tool inte
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> then lets go the route you proposed -- invert the logic. default includes
> the
> -pedantic flag while the HOSTCOMPILE_NOPED does not. and we use that for the
> code that needs newer standards.
OK.
Should I drop the easylogo change, if it's currently being built outsi
On Friday 30 October 2009 11:53:43 Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Scott Wood wrote:
> > > We can't build everything with it, as we have a lot of code that is
> > > incompatible. There were already exceptions in the makefiles for these
> > > f
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
>
> In message <20091029161835.ga28...@loki.buserror.net> you wrote:
> >
> > We can't build everything with it, as we have a lot of code that is
> > incompatible. There were already exceptions in the makefiles for t
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <20091029161835.ga28...@loki.buserror.net> you wrote:
>
> We can't build everything with it, as we have a lot of code that is
> incompatible. There were already exceptions in the makefiles for these
> files. Fixing that code is beyond the scope of this change, especia
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:27:26AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 15:34:10 Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:57:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > perhaps it would make more sense to create a HOSTCOMPILE/HOSTLINK (or
> > > whatever) variable so this ki
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 15:34:10 Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:57:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > perhaps it would make more sense to create a HOSTCOMPILE/HOSTLINK (or
> > whatever) variable so this kind of thing isnt missed ?
> > HOSTCOMPILE = $(HOSTCC) $(HOSTCFLAGS)
> >
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:57:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2009 18:17:03 Scott Wood wrote:
> > Currently, some of the tools instead set CC to be HOSTCC in order to re-use
> > some pattern rules -- but this fails when the user overrides CC on the make
> > command line. A
On Monday 26 October 2009 18:17:03 Scott Wood wrote:
> Currently, some of the tools instead set CC to be HOSTCC in order to re-use
> some pattern rules -- but this fails when the user overrides CC on the make
> command line. Also, the HOSTCFLAGS in tools/Makefile are currently not
> being used bec
Currently, some of the tools instead set CC to be HOSTCC in order to re-use
some pattern rules -- but this fails when the user overrides CC on the make
command line. Also, the HOSTCFLAGS in tools/Makefile are currently not
being used because config.mk overwrites them.
This patch adds static patte
10 matches
Mail list logo
