I agree with York. Keep the name as is-- ls2080a. We already went
through the name change from ls2085a to ls2080a last year in Linux and
in u-boot and there is no reason to go back. The fact that the RDB
boards have the wrong name printed on them is not enough reason to
revert what we already
On 01/20/2016 04:46 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> * LS2085ARDB and LS2085AQDS host LS2080A and LS2085A,
> So update model and board name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
> ---
> arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-qds.dts|2 +-
> arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dts|2 +-
> board/frees
Hi Ashish,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Ashish,
> Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:33 PM
> To: prabhakar.khusw...@nxp.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ls2085a: Correct the model &
* LS2085ARDB and LS2085AQDS host LS2080A and LS2085A,
So update model and board name.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
---
arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-qds.dts|2 +-
arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dts|2 +-
board/freescale/ls2080aqds/ls2080aqds.c |3 +--
board/freescale/ls2
4 matches
Mail list logo