Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i386 - resolve conflicting definitions of show_boot_progress

Dear Graeme Russ, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch eliminates an apparent conflict in the definition of > show_boot_progress (defined in both assembler and in C) which > the linker was not picking up but was causing a reset. Why do we need two implementations of the same fun

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i386 - resolve conflicting definitions of show_boot_progress

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> please take a look hear >> >> I've already send patch to fix X86 >> >> 4698 F May18 To u-boot-users [PATCH 00/17] x86: Fix warning