Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
> probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
>
> diff --git
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
>
> It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the
NAND testing was merged into mainline yesterday, so ARM should be
happy with that
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
>
> It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the
> ARM tree, not without pulling the nand tree first. Or, even if they will
> apply, i
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
> > probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
>
> SMD6400 is ARM code, so
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
> probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
Best regards,
Wolfg
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0cab77a..343393c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAIN
6 matches
Mail list logo