On 5/23/19 8:43 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> commit 1b898ff ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
> a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to the
> of_node of its bank subnode.
>
> What it meant to do was assign subdev->node, not dev->node.
>
> While this d
commit 1b898ff ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to the
of_node of its bank subnode.
What it meant to do was assign subdev->node, not dev->node.
While this doesn't affect too many use cases, iterating over the gpio
c
On 5/22/19 10:46 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:22 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> On 5/21/19 10:03 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> commit 1b898ffc040b ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
>>> a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:22 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/21/19 10:03 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > commit 1b898ffc040b ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
> > a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to the
> > of_node of its bank subnode.
> >
> > What
On 5/21/19 10:03 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> commit 1b898ffc040b ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
> a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to the
> of_node of its bank subnode.
>
> What it meant to do was assign subdev->node, not dev->node.
>
> While
commit 1b898ffc040b ("gpio: dwapb_gpio: convert to livetree") introduced
a bug in that dev->node of the gpio chip was accidentally set to the
of_node of its bank subnode.
What it meant to do was assign subdev->node, not dev->node.
While this doesn't affect too many use cases, iterating over the g
6 matches
Mail list logo