Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix lib_arm/bootm.c

2008-11-29 Thread Dirk Behme
Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Daniel Mack wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>while digging thru the sources to find out why U-Boot won't start my >>Linux kernel, I stumbled over lib_arm/bootm.c and its check for the falg >>variable. I wonder how this ever worked as the condition is really heavy >>to match unless BOOT

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix lib_arm/bootm.c

2008-11-28 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:37 Fri 28 Nov , Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Daniel Mack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while digging thru the sources to find out why U-Boot won't start my > > Linux kernel, I stumbled over lib_arm/bootm.c and its check for the falg > > variable. I wonder how this ever worked as the condition is re

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix lib_arm/bootm.c

2008-11-28 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi, > > while digging thru the sources to find out why U-Boot won't start my > Linux kernel, I stumbled over lib_arm/bootm.c and its check for the falg > variable. I wonder how this ever worked as the condition is really heavy > to match unless BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO is 0 which it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix lib_arm/bootm.c

2008-11-28 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 20:36 Fri 28 Nov , Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi, > > while digging thru the sources to find out why U-Boot won't start my > Linux kernel, I stumbled over lib_arm/bootm.c and its check for the falg > variable. I wonder how this ever worked as the condition is really heavy > to match unless BOOTM_

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fix lib_arm/bootm.c

2008-11-28 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi, while digging thru the sources to find out why U-Boot won't start my Linux kernel, I stumbled over lib_arm/bootm.c and its check for the falg variable. I wonder how this ever worked as the condition is really heavy to match unless BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO is 0 which it isn't. So I guess the patch be